| Vol 12 No. 40,
Jun 19 - Jun 25 2003 | |||||||||
-ART-
| GLASS MY
ASS Emily Hall Tries to Overcome Her Loathing of Glass Trinkets by Emily Hall
Pilchuck Glass School Exhibition
Through July 18.
Gas, Cash or Glass Through July 3.
This Is Not Art Glass Through June 29.
For a city known for glass art, there are lots of art people around
here who fucking hate it. This, I feel, is understandable--not unlike a
colonized state's ardent distrust of the colonizer. To much of the
civilized world, glass in Seattle eclipses all other art.
So much so that for the authentic Seattle touch, the set of the
television show Frasier features a Chihuly sculpture. But the
disdain for glass is not just sour grapes; it also has something to do
with how easy glass is. Much has been made of the roots of the
studio glass movement, in which glass transcended craft and became art,
but it often seems that this is simply a case of the rigorousness of
method being confused with complexity of thought. (It's true that glass
blowing is intense, and fun to watch. Institutions like Tacoma's Museum of
Glass have turned the hot shop into a performance arena, as important as
the galleries.) There is a sentimentality that attaches itself to glass,
the kind of thing that is approached by earthy "lyrical" writing, of the
fused-in-fire and born-of-breath sort. Glass is also pretty; and pretty
plus sentimental almost never makes interesting (let alone great) art.
The great glass artists seem to be artists who happen to work in glass,
like Josiah McElheny--artists who tend to think carefully about why one
medium is used instead of another (the opposite is a case of nursing
too-reverent feelings about any one medium in particular). In three
unusual glass shows--put out in conjunction with thousands of people
arriving for the Glass Art Society conference in town this month--there's
a little rebellious streak, distinctly anti-reverent, that bodes pretty
well for leveraging glass out of its decorative rut.
Oddly enough, some of that work is in a Pilchuck School exhibition;
Pilchuck, of course, was cofounded by Dale Chihuly, but it seems that
artists are managing to think around him. Stuart Keeler's stacked pile of
wood pallets topped with a cast-glass pallet has an ugly-duckling quality:
ugly because it's useless compared to the others; swanlike because it's an
unexpected object of contemplation. A series of glass bells by Timothy
Ringsmuth contain Victorian-style hair sculptures, twisted into loosely
botanical shapes; glass, of course, is a protective medium for living
things as well as for memento mori. The bells and the crystal pedestals
are also handmade, perhaps as much a part of an intricate mourning
process, as the elaborately twined hair.
Mark Zirpel's sculpture fills a set of rubber lungs inside a delicately
notched glass container. The mechanism wheezes and growls like an old
steam engine, and its parts look old-fashioned and unreliable; the theme
of body as delicate container has been examined before, but here it
acquires a sideshow, slightly oompah air that is not unwelcome.
Roq la Rue's Kirsten Anderson has filled her gallery with work that
both flaunts and subverts the clichés of glass--partly by showing work
that is very Roq-la-Rue-style, all made of glass. Glass flames, impossible
glass high-heeled shoes (like stripper shoes, or court shoes in the time
of the Sun King), glass marshmallow Peeps.... I loved Bill Akers'
Calamari Chandelier, which is as snaky, creepy, and marine as the
Chihuly seaforms are idealized, artsy, and overpretty.
In This Is Not Art Glass, curators Helen Curtis and Jessica
Balsam take a more pointed tack, with work that deliberately tests
received notions of glass art. Marc Dombrosky highlights the
precariousness and silliness of glass in an unsteady assemblage of
thrift-store cups--funny, but with unexpected stature. The delicate-body
theme is explored in Ilasahai Prouty's hanging cluster of glass bones,
string, and medical tubing.
Much of the work in Not Art Glass refers to the ruts that glass
finds itself in--precious container, decorative object--and posits an
alternative kind of art, in which the fetish aura around the object is
cleared away in favor of the object itself. It doesn't always work, but at
least there are artists asking the right question, which in this case is
not how glass, but why?
|
Linking? Use This URL!
TIMOTHY RINGSMUTH Memento mori.
|
| HOME | ARCHIVES |
FEATURE
| NEWS |
CALENDAR
| COLUMNS
| ARTS |
CLASSIFIEDS
| PERSONALS
| CONTACT |
SEARCH
|